By Aman Ullah
References:
1) Gutman, Pamla, Ancient Arakan, ANA (1976) P.71
2) Hodivala SH Dr., Studies in History of Indian Muslims, New Delhi (1992) P.59
3) Sir H. Yule, in the Proceedings f the Royal Geographical Society (Nov. 1882) also Phayre, Arthur BP. History of Burma, London (1884) P. 42
4) Mc Crindle , India as described by Megas thenes and Arrian , P. 162, Hall DGE, A Study of South East Asia, London (1968) P.141.
5) Habibullah ABM, A note on ‘Could Muhammad Shah Sur conquers Arakan’, JBSB (1951) PP-13-14
6) BSPP Hqs, ‘Culture and Civilizations of National Races “Rakhhine” Rangoon (1976) P. 36
7) Elliot HM and Dowson J, ‘History of India as told by its own historians’ P. 73
8) Habson-Jobson, p.34
9) JASB Vol. V (1836) P. iv
10) N. Bhattasali Commemoration Volume, Dhaka (1966) p. 354
11) Ibid
12) Ibid, p. 355
13) Foster, Ralf Fitch, p.26
14) Asiatic Research, New Delhi (1979) Vol., V P.233
15) Qnungo, SB, Dr., A History of Chittagong, Vol. 1 Chittagong (1988) p.352
16) Ibid, p.232
17) Pamla Gutman, Ancient Arakan, Ph.D. Thesis, Australia National University (1976), p.3
18) JAS LXVII (1951) P. 11
19) Journal of the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums, Government of West Bengal, Culcutta (1995) P.285
20) Qanango, P. 159-160
21) B Commemoration, P.356
22) Asiatic Research, Vol.,V, New Delhi (1979)p.233
23) Willem Van Schendel, Froncis Buchanan, In South East Bengal, Dhaka(1992) P. 104, 108.
24) Ganganath Jha: Rohingya Imbroglio: Implications for Bangladesh, Foreign Policy of Bangladesh, edited by S.R. Chakravarty, New Delhi (1994) p.29
Arakan is a modern name. There exists some controversy about the origin
of the name of ‘Arakan’ on which traditional and legendary sources
differ. In fact, the name of Arakan is much antiquity.
In the
North face of the Anandacandra Stone inscription, there is a word
‘arekadesa vijayam’ on line 42; many think that it is the name of the
country that is Arakan. But according to Gutman, if it is Arekadesa it
may be the name of the country in the 11 century. It also could read
anekadesa. [1]
Moreover, According to Professor SH Hodivala, the
prominent numismatic of India in early 19 century, the modern form of
Arakan was derived from the Arabic ‘Al-Rakhang’, in his book ‘Studies on
History of Indian Muslims’. This book was a critical commentary on
‘Elliot and Dowson’s History of India’ by as told its own Historians.
[2]
In Ptolemy’s Geografia (150 AD) a country named “Argyre”.
Sir Yule wants to identify with Arakan the name being supposed to be
derived from silver mines existing there.[3] Sir Yule assumption is
supported by Mc Cridle and D.G.E Hall.[4] Early Buddhist missionaries
called Arakan as ‘Rekkha Pura’.[5]
In the inscription of Pagan dated 1299 AD, was “Rakhuin”.[6] In the work of Rashidudin (c.1310 AD), the Arab geographer, it appears as ‘Rahan’.[7] Venetian Nicolo di Conti (1420-1430) wrote the name of the country “Rachani” and Sidhelobi, a Turkish navigator belong to the middle of 16th century writes it “Rakanj”.[8] In the map of “Magni Mongolis Imperium” (The great Mughul Empire), drawn in 1650, which is the earliest maps of the Indian region, it was being shown as “Aracam”.[9] In Ain-i-Akbari of Abul Fazal (1551-1602) mentioned Arakan as “Arkhang”. In the Baharistan-i-Ghaibi, Mirza Nathan mentioned the people as “Rakangi” while the name of the county as “Arkhang”.[10] In the Fathiyya-i- Ibriyya, Shahabuddin Talish also consistently spelled the name of the country as “Rakhang”.[11]
In the inscription of Pagan dated 1299 AD, was “Rakhuin”.[6] In the work of Rashidudin (c.1310 AD), the Arab geographer, it appears as ‘Rahan’.[7] Venetian Nicolo di Conti (1420-1430) wrote the name of the country “Rachani” and Sidhelobi, a Turkish navigator belong to the middle of 16th century writes it “Rakanj”.[8] In the map of “Magni Mongolis Imperium” (The great Mughul Empire), drawn in 1650, which is the earliest maps of the Indian region, it was being shown as “Aracam”.[9] In Ain-i-Akbari of Abul Fazal (1551-1602) mentioned Arakan as “Arkhang”. In the Baharistan-i-Ghaibi, Mirza Nathan mentioned the people as “Rakangi” while the name of the county as “Arkhang”.[10] In the Fathiyya-i- Ibriyya, Shahabuddin Talish also consistently spelled the name of the country as “Rakhang”.[11]
In a Latin Geography (1597 AD) by Peta Vino, the country was referred
to as ‘Aracan’. In English version of Van Linschtoen’s Map of 1598 AD,
it is “Aracan”. Friar Manrique (1628-43 AD) mentions the country as
‘Aracan’. [12]The British Traveler, Relph Fitch (1586 AD) referred the
name of Arakan as “Rocon”.[13] In the Rennell’s map (17771 AD) it is
“Rawssawn”.[14]
Hindus in his map (1612 A.D.), has been induced
to make the country name “Aracam”[15] To the Medieval Portuguese and
other European travelers and chroniclers, it is ‘Rocan’, ‘Rakan’,
‘Arracam, ‘Aracao’, ‘Orrakam’.[16] The Portuguese traveler Barros in
1516 AD is said to be first man who referred ‘Aracan’ which is the
nearest to the modern name, in his Decadar.[17] According to eminent
numismatists like Lanepole, Rodgers and Wright, Bengal king Sultan
Muhammad Khan Sur struck coins bearing the date 962 A.H.(1554 AD)
styling himself Sultan Shamshuddin Muhammad Shah Ghazi, the name of mint
is read as “Arakan”.[18] A few of these coins are preserved in the
London British Museum. One coin of Shams al Din Muhammad Shah Ghazi
(SI.199), is also preserved in the Indian Museum, bears a date of 962 AH
and mint name of ‘Arakan’. The coin is similar to those published by
Marsden, Lanepole and Wright. [19]
In Tripura Chronicle Rajmala
mentions the name of Arakan as ‘Roshang’.[20] In the medieval works of
the poets of Arakan and Chittagong, like Quazi Daulat, Mardan, Shamser
Ali, Quraishi Magan, Alaol, Ainuddin, Abdul Ghani and others, they
frequently referred to Arakan as ‘Roshang’, ‘Roshanga’, ‘Roshango Shar’,
and ‘Roshango Des’.[21] Famous European traveler Francis Buchanam
(1762-1829 AD) in his accounts mentioned Arakan as ‘‚Reng, Roung,
Rossawn, Russawn, Rung‛. In one of his accounts, “A Comparative
Vocabulary of some of the languages spoken in the Burman Empire” it was
stated that, ‚ the native Mugs of Arakan called themselves ‘Yakin’,
which name is also commonly given to them by the Burmese. By the people
of Pegu are named ‘Taling’. By the Bengal Hindus, at least by such of
them as have been settled in Arakan, the country is called ‘Rossawn’.
from whence, I suppose , Mr. Rennell has been induced to make a country
named “Rossawn” occupy part of his map, not conceiving that it would be
Arakan , kingdom of Mugs, as we often called it. The Mahammedans who
have long settled at Arakan call the country ‘Rovingaw’ and called
themselves ‘Rohinga’ or native of Arakan. The Persians called it
‘Rekon.‛[22] The Chakmas and Saks of 18th century called it ‘Roang’.[23]
Muslims and Mugs of some parts of southern Chittagong, who are
descendent of Arakan origin, are called ‘Rohang Muslim’ and ‘Rohang
Magh’ by the Chittagonian.
Today, The Muslims of Arakan called
their country, in their own language, ‘Rohang or Roang’ and called
themselves as Rohangya (Rohang+ya) or Roangya (Roang+ya) means native of
Rohang or Roang. In Burmese it is ‘ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာ’, in Rakhine’s
pronunciation it will read as ‘Rohongya’ but in Burmese pronunciation it
became ‘Rohingya’ and now it’s established as ‘Rohingya’. The Mugs call
themselves “Rakine” and call the country “Rakhine Prey” or country of
Rakhine.
The term Rohingya is widely used by the international
community to identify as a group of Muslims of Arakan. According to Dr.
Ganganath Jha of Jawaharlal Nehru University of India, the term Rohingya
is derived from Rohang the ancient name of Arakan. [24]
References:
1) Gutman, Pamla, Ancient Arakan, ANA (1976) P.71
2) Hodivala SH Dr., Studies in History of Indian Muslims, New Delhi (1992) P.59
3) Sir H. Yule, in the Proceedings f the Royal Geographical Society (Nov. 1882) also Phayre, Arthur BP. History of Burma, London (1884) P. 42
4) Mc Crindle , India as described by Megas thenes and Arrian , P. 162, Hall DGE, A Study of South East Asia, London (1968) P.141.
5) Habibullah ABM, A note on ‘Could Muhammad Shah Sur conquers Arakan’, JBSB (1951) PP-13-14
6) BSPP Hqs, ‘Culture and Civilizations of National Races “Rakhhine” Rangoon (1976) P. 36
7) Elliot HM and Dowson J, ‘History of India as told by its own historians’ P. 73
8) Habson-Jobson, p.34
9) JASB Vol. V (1836) P. iv
10) N. Bhattasali Commemoration Volume, Dhaka (1966) p. 354
11) Ibid
12) Ibid, p. 355
13) Foster, Ralf Fitch, p.26
14) Asiatic Research, New Delhi (1979) Vol., V P.233
15) Qnungo, SB, Dr., A History of Chittagong, Vol. 1 Chittagong (1988) p.352
16) Ibid, p.232
17) Pamla Gutman, Ancient Arakan, Ph.D. Thesis, Australia National University (1976), p.3
18) JAS LXVII (1951) P. 11
19) Journal of the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums, Government of West Bengal, Culcutta (1995) P.285
20) Qanango, P. 159-160
21) B Commemoration, P.356
22) Asiatic Research, Vol.,V, New Delhi (1979)p.233
23) Willem Van Schendel, Froncis Buchanan, In South East Bengal, Dhaka(1992) P. 104, 108.
24) Ganganath Jha: Rohingya Imbroglio: Implications for Bangladesh, Foreign Policy of Bangladesh, edited by S.R. Chakravarty, New Delhi (1994) p.29
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.