Aman Ullah
RB Article
August 12, 2016
“Muslims of Arakan certainly belong to one of the indigenous races
of Burma, which you represent. In fact, there are no pure indigenous
races in Burma and that if you do not belong to indigenous races Burma;
we also cannot be taken as indigenous races of Burma.” President Saw Shwe Thaik,
The International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples, celebrated each
year on 9 August, marks the day of the first meeting, in 1982, of the
UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations of the Sub-commission on the
Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.
This year, the International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples is
devoted to indigenous peoples' right to education, given the persistent
gaps between indigenous and non -indigenous students in terms of access
to education, school retention and graduation rates in all regions of
the world.
“On this International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples, I call on
Governments everywhere ... to improve access to education for indigenous
peoples and to reflect their experiences and culture in places of
learning," said United Nations Secretary -General Ban Ki -moon, adding,
"Let us commit to ensuring indigenous peoples are not left behind as we
pursue the vision of the Sustainable Development Goals.”
The right of indigenous peoples to education is protected by the UN
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which in Article 14
states that “Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control
their educational systems and institutions providing education in their
own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of
teaching and learning.”
The adjective indigenous is derived from the two Ancient Greek words
indo= endo/ "ενδό(ς)", meaning inside/within, and genous= (γέννoυς),
meaning birth/born and also race, etymology meaning "native" or "born
within".
James Anaya, former Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, has defined indigenous peoples as "living
descendants of pre-invasion inhabitants of lands now dominated by
others. They are culturally distinct groups that find themselves
engulfed by other settler societies born of forces of empire and
conquest".
They form at present non-dominant sectors of society and are determined
to preserve, develop and transmit to future generations their ancestral
territories, and their ethnic identity, as the basis of their continued
existence as peoples, in accordance with their own cultural patterns,
social institutions and legal system.
In 1972 the United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations
(WGIP) accepted as a preliminary definition a formulation put forward by
Mr. José R. Martínez-Cobo, Special Rapporteur on Discrimination against
Indigenous Populations. This definition has some limitations, because
the definition applies mainly to pre-colonial populations, and would
likely exclude other isolated or marginal societies.
“Indigenous communities, peoples, and nations are those that, having a
historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that
developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other
sectors of the societies now prevailing in those territories, or parts
of them. They form at present non-dominant sectors of society and are
determined to preserve, develop, and transmit to future generations
their ancestral territories, and their ethnic identity, as the basis of
their continued existence as peoples, in accordance with their own
cultural patterns, social institutions and legal systems.”
Thus, Indigenous peoples were the descendants of those peoples that
inhabited a territory prior to colonization or formation of the present
state.
The Rohingyas are Muslims who are living in Arakan generation after
generation for centuries after centuries. They are nationals as well as
an indigenous community of Burma. They are equal in every way with other
communities of the country. Their arrival in Arakan has pre-dated the
arrival of many other peoples and races now residing in Arakan and other
parts of Burma. They developed from different stocks of peoples and
concentrated in a common geographical location forming their own society
with a consolidated population in Arakan well before the Burman
invasion in 1784.
Mr. M.A. Gaffer, from Buthidaung, was a member of 1947 Constitutional
Assembly, an Upper House MP from 1951 to 1960 and also a Parliamentary
Secretary in Health Ministry.
He wrote, in his Memorandum, which was presented to the Regional Autonomy Enquiry Commission dated the 24th May, 1949, that,
“We the Rohingyas of Arakan are a nation. We maintain and hold that
Rohingyas and Arakanse are two major nations in Arakan. We are a nation
of nearly nine lakhs more than enough population for a nation; and what
is more we are a nation according to any definition of a nation with our
own distinctive culture and civilization, language and literature, art
and architecture, names and nomenclature, sense of value and proportion,
legal laws and moral codes, customs and calendar, history and
traditions aptitude and ambitions, in short, we have our distinctive
outlook on life and of life. By all canons of international law the
Rohingyas are a nation in Arakan."
Mr. Sultan Ahmed, from Maung Daw, was a member of 1947 Constitutional
Assembly, a Member of Parliament from 1951 to 1960 and was Parliamentary
Secretary to the Ministry of Minorities, Ministry of Relief and
Resettlement, and the Ministry of Social and Religious Affairs, with the
status of Deputy Minister. He was one of the longest serving
parliamentary secretaries.
According to him, “when section 11 of the constitution of the Union
of Burma was being framed, a doubt as to whether the Muslims of North
Arakan fell under the section of sub-clauses (I) (II) and (III),
arose. In effect an objection was put in to have the doubt cleared in
respect of the term ‘indigenous’ as used in the constitution. But it was
ithdrawn on the understanding and assurance of the President of the
Constitutional Assembly, at present His Excellency the President of the
Union of Burma, who, when approached for clarification with this
question, said, ‘Muslims of Arakan certainly belong to one of the
indigenous races of Burma, which you represent. In fact, there are no
pure indigenous races in Burma and that if you do not belong to
indigenous races Burma; we also cannot be taken as indigenous races of
Burma.’ Being satisfied with his kind explanation, the objection put in was withdrawn.”
Being indigenous peoples, they have the right to maintain and strengthen
their distinct political, economic, social and cultural
characteristics, as well as their legal systems, while retaining their
rights to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political,
economic, social and cultural life of State. Not only have they had the
right to a nationality but also the rights to their lands, territories
and resources, which derive from their political, economic and social
structures and from their cultures, spirituals traditions, histories and
philosophies.
Under any cannons of international law and human civilization the
Rohingyas are much more than a national minority. They are a nation with
a population of more than 3 million (both home and abroad), having a
supporting history, separate culture, civilization, language and
literature, historically settled territory and reasonable size of
population and area. They share a public culture different from the
public culture of those around them. They are determined not only to
preserve and develop their public culture, but also to transmit to
future generations as the basis of their continued existence as people,
in accordance with their own cultural pattern, social institution and
legal system.
Being indigenous peoples, they have the right to maintain and
strengthen their distinct political, economic, social and cultural
characteristics, as well as their legal systems, while retaining
their rights to participate fully, if they so choose, in the
political, economic, social and cultural life of State. Not only have
they had the right to a nationality but also the rights to their lands,
territories and resources, which derive from their political, economic
and social structures and from their cultures, spirituals traditions,
histories and philosophies.
Thus, during the colonial rule the British recognized the separate
identity of the Rohingyas and declared north Arakan as the Muslim
Region. Again there are instances that Prime Minister U Nu, Prime
Minister U Ba Swe, other ministers and high- ranking civil and military
official, stated that the Rohingyas people like the Shan, Kachin, Karen,
Kaya, Mon and Rakhine. They have the same rights and privileges as
the other nationals of Burma regardless of their religious beliefs or
ethnic background.
Being one of the indigenous communities of Burma, the Rohingyas were
enfranchised in all the national and local elections of Burma. Their
representatives were in the Legislative Assembly, in the Constituent
Assembly and in the Parliament. As members of the new Parliament, their
representatives took the oath of allegiance to the Union of Burma on the
4thJanuary 1948. Their representatives were appointed as cabinet
ministers and parliamentary secretaries. They had their own political,
cultural, social organizations and had their programme in their own
language in the official Burma Broadcasting Services (BSS). As a Burma’s
racial groups, they participated in the official “Union Day’
celebration in Burma’s capital, Rangoon, every year. To satisfy part of
their demand, the government granted them limited local autonomy and
declared establishment of Mayu Frontier Administration (MFA) in early
60s, a special frontier district to be ruled directly by the central
government.
In spite of that the Rohingya are the worst victims of human rights
violations in Burma. They were displaced. Their identity was polluted.
Their population was diluted. Their right to nationality was
arbitrarily deprived. Since 1948, expelling the Rohingyas from their
ancestral land and properties has become almost a recurring phenomenon.
About 2 million uprooted Rohingyas have taken shelters in many
countries of the world since the anti-Muslim pogrom of 1942 in Arakan.
Since 1942, the Rakhine Buddhists pushed the Muslims from the southern Arakan to the northern Arakan.
Since 1962, successive military regimes denied their citizenship right
by labeling that they are illegal immigrants from Bangaladesh.
Since 1982, the regimes completely denied the citizenship rights of the
Rohingyas by enacting the most controversial Citizenship Law -1982.
Since 2012, the Thein Sein regime rejected their identity and forcefully making them Bengali.
Since then, the Rohingya have been backed into a corner, their lives
made so intolerable that tens of thousands have fled by sea, seeking
safety and a sense of dignity elsewhere. Surviving the perilous journey
to Bangladesh, Thailand or Malaysia is, too often, seen as the only way
to finally be free from persecution.
Campaigns of terror, crimes against humanity and extermination have been
perpetrated against the Rohingya in a systematic and planned way. The
restrictions on freedom of movement, marriage and education have dashed
any future hope of development for the Rohingya, including forming
families, all while they live in subhuman conditions amidst abject
poverty. Humiliating restrictions on movement—even on travel from place
to place within the same locality—have affected all normal activities in
all fields, crippling the Rohingya socially, economically and
educationally. The Rohingya have been singled out for systematic
destruction.
Today, this group is increasingly jobless, homeless, without land of
their own and the most illiterate section of Burma’s population. They
are not tolerated and are systematically excluded and rendered
‘stateless’ in their own homeland because of their religious belief and
ethnicity. They are not only denied their nationality but also their
citizenships rights. They are now a people without a country dying alive
and facing ‘slow-burning genocide’.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.